![]() Measurements made by means of satellites show no global warming but a cooling of 0.13☌ between 19. Most members of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change believe that current climate models do not accurately portray the atmosphere-ocean system. Policymaking should be guided by proved fact, not speculation. I have never witnessed a more disturbing corruption of the peer-review process than the events that led to this IPCC report.” 4 This led Dr Frederick Seitz, former head of the United States National Academy of Sciences, to write, “In more than sixty years as a member of the American scientific community. What happened was that the policymakers’ summary (which became the “take home message” for politicians) altered the conclusions of the scientists. 3 The original draft document did not say this. McMichael and Haines quote the 1995 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which is widely believed to “prove” that climate change induced by humans has occurred. We do not agree.” 2 Those who have signed the letter represent the overwhelming majority of climate change scientists in the United States, of whom there are about 60. They are based on the unsupported assumption that catastrophic global warming follows from the burning of fossil fuel and requires immediate action. “The policy initiatives derive from highly uncertain scientific theories. A letter signed by over 50 leading members of the American Meteorological Society warned about the policies promoted by environmental pressure groups. Whether most scientists outside climatology believe that global warming is happening is less relevant than whether the climatologists do. 1 In his editorial Smith asserts, “virtually all scientists agree that global warming is happening.” Global warming is now joining the list of “what everyone knows.” ![]() “Chris has edited and published some of the finest writers of recent decades, and Journal readers are sure to benefit as he and his team sort the good from the bad in literature, culture, politics, science and other subjects in our daily and weekend reviews.”Ĭarduff, a graduate of Macalester College, will relocate from Boston to New York and lead the Journal’s talented book review team of David Propson, Erich Eichman, Tim Farrington, Dorothy Rabinowitz and Ben Shull.Editor-The apocalyptic tone that Smith adopted in relation to the environment bears little relation to reality. “I’m thrilled that Christopher Carduff has agreed to bring his enormous talent and experience to the Journal as books editor,” said editorial page editor Paul Gigot. ![]() As the publishing consultant to the Updike literary trust, he has edited Updike’s Higher Gossip, Always Looking, Collected Stories and Selected Poems, and is currently overseeing the Library of American edition of his novels and a forthcoming collection of his letters. He is the estate-appointed editor of posthumous works by Maeve Brennan, Penelope Fitzgerald, Daniel Fuchs, Willam Maxwell, and, most notably, John Updike. Since 2006 he has been an editor and publishing consultant at the Library of America, where he has conceived and overseen multi-volume editions of the collected workers of classic writers including Carson McCullers, Katherine Anne Porter, Virgil Thomson, Kurt Vonnegut and Laura Ingalls Wilder. He will be responsible for the daily book reviews as well as the collection of reviews in the weekend Review section.Ĭhris brings to the Journal a wealth of experience as a distinguished editor in book and magazine publishing. (NEW YORK, NY) The Wall Street Journal announced today the hiring of Christopher Carduff as Books Editor.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |